Clutching construction

Topological construct

In topology, a branch of mathematics, the clutching construction is a way of constructing fiber bundles, particularly vector bundles on spheres.

Definition

Consider the sphere S n {\displaystyle S^{n}} as the union of the upper and lower hemispheres D + n {\displaystyle D_{+}^{n}} and D n {\displaystyle D_{-}^{n}} along their intersection, the equator, an S n 1 {\displaystyle S^{n-1}} .

Given trivialized fiber bundles with fiber F {\displaystyle F} and structure group G {\displaystyle G} over the two hemispheres, then given a map f : S n 1 G {\displaystyle f\colon S^{n-1}\to G} (called the clutching map), glue the two trivial bundles together via f.

Formally, it is the coequalizer of the inclusions S n 1 × F D + n × F D n × F {\displaystyle S^{n-1}\times F\to D_{+}^{n}\times F\coprod D_{-}^{n}\times F} via ( x , v ) ( x , v ) D + n × F {\displaystyle (x,v)\mapsto (x,v)\in D_{+}^{n}\times F} and ( x , v ) ( x , f ( x ) ( v ) ) D n × F {\displaystyle (x,v)\mapsto (x,f(x)(v))\in D_{-}^{n}\times F} : glue the two bundles together on the boundary, with a twist.

Thus we have a map π n 1 G Fib F ( S n ) {\displaystyle \pi _{n-1}G\to {\text{Fib}}_{F}(S^{n})} : clutching information on the equator yields a fiber bundle on the total space.

In the case of vector bundles, this yields π n 1 O ( k ) Vect k ( S n ) {\displaystyle \pi _{n-1}O(k)\to {\text{Vect}}_{k}(S^{n})} , and indeed this map is an isomorphism (under connect sum of spheres on the right).

Generalization

The above can be generalized by replacing D ± n {\displaystyle D_{\pm }^{n}} and S n {\displaystyle S^{n}} with any closed triad ( X ; A , B ) {\displaystyle (X;A,B)} , that is, a space X, together with two closed subsets A and B whose union is X. Then a clutching map on A B {\displaystyle A\cap B} gives a vector bundle on X.

Classifying map construction

Let p : M N {\displaystyle p\colon M\to N} be a fibre bundle with fibre F {\displaystyle F} . Let U {\displaystyle {\mathcal {U}}} be a collection of pairs ( U i , q i ) {\displaystyle (U_{i},q_{i})} such that q i : p 1 ( U i ) N × F {\displaystyle q_{i}\colon p^{-1}(U_{i})\to N\times F} is a local trivialization of p {\displaystyle p} over U i N {\displaystyle U_{i}\subset N} . Moreover, we demand that the union of all the sets U i {\displaystyle U_{i}} is N {\displaystyle N} (i.e. the collection is an atlas of trivializations i U i = N {\displaystyle \coprod _{i}U_{i}=N} ).

Consider the space i U i × F {\displaystyle \coprod _{i}U_{i}\times F} modulo the equivalence relation ( u i , f i ) U i × F {\displaystyle (u_{i},f_{i})\in U_{i}\times F} is equivalent to ( u j , f j ) U j × F {\displaystyle (u_{j},f_{j})\in U_{j}\times F} if and only if U i U j ϕ {\displaystyle U_{i}\cap U_{j}\neq \phi } and q i q j 1 ( u j , f j ) = ( u i , f i ) {\displaystyle q_{i}\circ q_{j}^{-1}(u_{j},f_{j})=(u_{i},f_{i})} . By design, the local trivializations q i {\displaystyle q_{i}} give a fibrewise equivalence between this quotient space and the fibre bundle p {\displaystyle p} .

Consider the space i U i × Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle \coprod _{i}U_{i}\times \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} modulo the equivalence relation ( u i , h i ) U i × Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle (u_{i},h_{i})\in U_{i}\times \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} is equivalent to ( u j , h j ) U j × Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle (u_{j},h_{j})\in U_{j}\times \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} if and only if U i U j ϕ {\displaystyle U_{i}\cap U_{j}\neq \phi } and consider q i q j 1 {\displaystyle q_{i}\circ q_{j}^{-1}} to be a map q i q j 1 : U i U j Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle q_{i}\circ q_{j}^{-1}:U_{i}\cap U_{j}\to \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} then we demand that q i q j 1 ( u j ) ( h j ) = h i {\displaystyle q_{i}\circ q_{j}^{-1}(u_{j})(h_{j})=h_{i}} . That is, in our re-construction of p {\displaystyle p} we are replacing the fibre F {\displaystyle F} by the topological group of homeomorphisms of the fibre, Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} . If the structure group of the bundle is known to reduce, you could replace Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} with the reduced structure group. This is a bundle over N {\displaystyle N} with fibre Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} and is a principal bundle. Denote it by p : M p N {\displaystyle p\colon M_{p}\to N} . The relation to the previous bundle is induced from the principal bundle: ( M p × F ) / Homeo ( F ) = M {\displaystyle (M_{p}\times F)/\operatorname {Homeo} (F)=M} .

So we have a principal bundle Homeo ( F ) M p N {\displaystyle \operatorname {Homeo} (F)\to M_{p}\to N} . The theory of classifying spaces gives us an induced push-forward fibration M p N B ( Homeo ( F ) ) {\displaystyle M_{p}\to N\to B(\operatorname {Homeo} (F))} where B ( Homeo ( F ) ) {\displaystyle B(\operatorname {Homeo} (F))} is the classifying space of Homeo ( F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Homeo} (F)} . Here is an outline:

Given a G {\displaystyle G} -principal bundle G M p N {\displaystyle G\to M_{p}\to N} , consider the space M p × G E G {\displaystyle M_{p}\times _{G}EG} . This space is a fibration in two different ways:

1) Project onto the first factor: M p × G E G M p / G = N {\displaystyle M_{p}\times _{G}EG\to M_{p}/G=N} . The fibre in this case is E G {\displaystyle EG} , which is a contractible space by the definition of a classifying space.

2) Project onto the second factor: M p × G E G E G / G = B G {\displaystyle M_{p}\times _{G}EG\to EG/G=BG} . The fibre in this case is M p {\displaystyle M_{p}} .

Thus we have a fibration M p N M p × G E G B G {\displaystyle M_{p}\to N\simeq M_{p}\times _{G}EG\to BG} . This map is called the classifying map of the fibre bundle p : M N {\displaystyle p\colon M\to N} since 1) the principal bundle G M p N {\displaystyle G\to M_{p}\to N} is the pull-back of the bundle G E G B G {\displaystyle G\to EG\to BG} along the classifying map and 2) The bundle p {\displaystyle p} is induced from the principal bundle as above.

Contrast with twisted spheres

Twisted spheres are sometimes referred to as a "clutching-type" construction, but this is misleading: the clutching construction is properly about fiber bundles.

  • In twisted spheres, you glue two halves along their boundary. The halves are a priori identified (with the standard ball), and points on the boundary sphere do not in general go to their corresponding points on the other boundary sphere. This is a map S n 1 S n 1 {\displaystyle S^{n-1}\to S^{n-1}} : the gluing is non-trivial in the base.
  • In the clutching construction, you glue two bundles together over the boundary of their base hemispheres. The boundary spheres are glued together via the standard identification: each point goes to the corresponding one, but each fiber has a twist. This is a map S n 1 G {\displaystyle S^{n-1}\to G} : the gluing is trivial in the base, but not in the fibers.

Examples

The clutching construction is used to form the chiral anomaly, by gluing together a pair of self-dual curvature forms. Such forms are locally exact on each hemisphere, as they are differentials of the Chern–Simons 3-form; by gluing them together, the curvature form is no longer globally exact (and so has a non-trivial homotopy group π 3 . {\displaystyle \pi _{3}.} )

Similar constructions can be found for various instantons, including the Wess–Zumino–Witten model.

See also

  • Alexander trick

References

  • Allen Hatcher's book-in-progress Vector Bundles & K-Theory version 2.0, p. 22.
  • clutching construction on nLab