Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board
Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
Full case name | Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board |
Argued | September 16, 2022 |
Decided | May 23, 2023 |
Citation | 68 F.4th 864 (4th Cir. 2023). |
Case history | |
Appealed from | United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Appealed to | Supreme Court of the United States |
Subsequent action | Cert. denied. |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Robert Bruce King, Allison Jones Rushing, Toby J. Heytens |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | King |
Concurrence | Heytens |
Dissent | Rushing |
Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board, 68 F.4th 864 (4th Cir. 2023), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit case about the changes to Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology's admissions policy which were made in 2020. The Coalition for TJ, a local single-issue advocacy group, alleged that the changes that Fairfax County Public Schools made to the school's admission policy unfairly discriminate against Asian Americans. After the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled in favor of the Coalition for TJ in February 2022, FCPS appealed the ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which reversed the district court in May 2023.
On August 21, 2023, the Coalition petitioned the Supreme Court to hear its case.[1] On February 20, 2024, the Court declined to hear the case by denying certiorari.
Background
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJ) is a prestigious public magnet school that serves part of Northern Virginia. Students are admitted during eighth grade, for entrance the following year, to a class of around 500 students. Prior to 2020, admissions were principally conducted through applicants taking a standardized test, submitting letters of recommendation, and writing essays. In the fall of 2020, the Fairfax County School Board revised the admissions process, dropping the standardized test, removing the $100 application fee, and allocating a small number of seats in the incoming class of 2025 to each public middle school in the region, while evaluating students on their grades, essays, and "experience factors, including students who are economically disadvantaged, English language learners, special education students, or students who are currently attending underrepresented middle schools." Admissions for the class of 2025 saw Asian-American applicants receive 54% of the admissions offers, a decline from 73% for the class of 2024 (which was conducted under the previous policy).[2] The shares of white, black, and Hispanic students admitted increased.
The Coalition for TJ, a local single-issue advocacy group [[3]], opposed the changes to the admissions policy, asserting they would have a disparate impact on Asian applicants and the policy change was intended to racially balance the student body by reducing the number of Asian students (citing the public statements made by the Fairfax County School Board members). It is represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation.
2020 (Before Reform)[4] | 2021 (After Reform)[5] | |
---|---|---|
Asian | 73.0 | 54.36 |
White | 17.7 | 22.36 |
Black | ≤2.1[a] | 7.09 |
Hispanic | 3.3 | 11.27 |
Multiracial/Other | 6.0 | 4.91 |
Lower court proceedings
District court
On March 10, 2021, the Coalition filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, challenging the admissions policy as enacted with discriminatory intent against applicants of Asian descent, under Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. The case was assigned to Judge Claude M. Hilton. The Coalition twice sought preliminary injunctions blocking use of the 2020 admissions policy; Hilton denied them on May 26, 2021, and September 20, 2021. A bench trial was scheduled to begin January 24, 2022; Hilton canceled it on January 18, after the parties agreed there was no genuine dispute as to any material fact.[6]
On February 25, 2022, Hilton granted the Coalition's motion for summary judgment and permanently enjoined enforcement of the 2020 admissions policy. In the opinion, he wrote the policy was "[a] means to accomplish [the Board's] goal of achieving racial balance, was to decrease enrollment of the only racial group 'overrepresented' at T.J.—Asian Americans. The board employed proxies that disproportionately burden Asian American students."[7]
On March 4, 2022, the School Board sought a stay of the injunction pending appeal. Hilton denied it on March 11.[6]
Court of appeals
On March 14, 2022, the Fairfax County School Board appealed the district court's permanent injunction against the 2020 admissions policy to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Former Solicitor General of the United States Donald B. Verrilli Jr. represents the board pro bono. The board sought to stay the decision pending resolution of the appeal. On March 31, 2022, the Fourth Circuit granted the stay in a 2–1 order. The majority was unreasoned; Judges Robert Bruce King and Toby Heytens joined it; Heytens also wrote a separate concurrence outlining his disagreement with Hilton's reasoning. Judge Allison Jones Rushing dissented.[8]
On April 8, 2022, the Coalition filed an emergency application in the Supreme Court of the United States to have the Fourth Circuit's stay vacated. Virginia and 15 other states filed an amicus curiae brief supporting the request. On April 25, 2022, the application was denied over the dissents of Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.[9] The case was heard in the court of appeals on September 16, 2022, and decided on May 23, 2023.[10] The Fourth Circuit, by a 2 to 1 vote, reversed the district court and restored the new admission plan.
Supreme Court
On August 21, 2023, the Coalition petitioned the Supreme Court to hear its case.[1] On February 20, 2024, the Court declined to hear the case by denying certiorari. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joined, wrote a dissent from the denial of certiorari.
Notes
- ^ In 2020, the number of black students admitted was 10 or fewer. FCPS did not report the exact number in order to protect student privacy. Since 486 students were admitted, this means the percentage of those students who were black was at most 2.1%.
References
- ^ a b "Docket for 23-170". Retrieved August 25, 2023.
- ^ Saul, Stephanie (February 16, 2022). "Conservatives Open New Front in Elite School Admission Wars". The New York Times. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ https://coalitionfortj.net
- ^ "TJHSST Offers Admission to 486 Students | Fairfax County Public Schools". June 1, 2020. Archived from the original on August 24, 2022.
- ^ "TJHSST Offers Admission to 550 Students; Broadens Access to Students Who Have an Aptitude for STEM | Fairfax County Public Schools". June 23, 2021. Archived from the original on August 24, 2022. Retrieved May 27, 2023.
- ^ a b "Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board (1:21-cv-00296)". CourtListener. Free Law Project. March 10, 2021. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ Robertson, Campbell; Saul, Stephanie (February 25, 2022). "Judge Strikes Down Elite Virginia High School's Admissions Rules". The New York Times. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ Natanson, Hannah (March 31, 2022). "Court says Thomas Jefferson admissions can remain as case proceeds". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (April 25, 2022). "Supreme Court Allows Elite High School's New Admissions Rules". The New York Times. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- ^ "Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board" (PDF). Retrieved May 24, 2023.
External links
- District Court Docket on CourtListener.com
- District Court Opinion granting Summary Judgment to Plaintiffs
- Fourth Circuit Order Staying Injunction
- Supreme Court Emergency Application No. 21A590
- Fairfax County School Board press release announcing new admissions policy Archived September 21, 2022, at the Wayback Machine
- v
- t
- e
lower court decisions
Education |
|
---|---|
Employment |
|
Grants, Contracting, and Set-Asides |
|
and edicts
- Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866
- Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (1868)
- Executive Order 10925 (1961)
- Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Executive Order 11246 (1965)
- Proposition 209 (CA, 1996)
- Initiative 200 (WA, 1998)
- Proposal 2 (MI, 2006)
- Amendment 46 (CO, 2008, failed)
- Initiative 424 (NE, 2008)
- Proposition 107 (AZ, 2010)
- State Question 759 (OK, 2012)
- Referendum 88 (WA, 2019, failed)
- Proposition 16 (CA, 2020, failed)
- Peter Arcidiacono
- Edward Blum
- Carl Cohen
- Ward Connerly
- Arthur Fletcher
- Richard Kahlenberg
- Richard Sander
- Stuart Taylor Jr.
- Abigail Thermstrom
- Stephan Thermstrom
- Ron Unz