Extradition Clause
The Extradition Clause or Interstate Rendition Clause[1] of the United States Constitution is Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2, which provides for the extradition of an accused criminal back to the state where they allegedly committed a crime.
Text
Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2:
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
History
Similar to a clause found in the Articles of Confederation, the Extradition Clause was included because the founders found that interstate rendition was separate from international extradition. Fearing that the clause was not self-executing, Congress passed the first rendition act in 1793 – now found under 18 U.S.C. § 3182.[1]
Interpretation
Kentucky v. Dennison
According to a book review in The New York Times in January 2015:
The Northwest Ordinance of July 1787 held that slaves "may be lawfully reclaimed" from free states and territories, and soon after, a fugitive slave clause — Article IV, Section 2 — was woven into the Constitution at the insistence of the Southern delegates, leading South Carolina's Charles Cotesworth Pinckney to boast, "We have obtained a right to recover our slaves in whatever part of America they may take refuge, which is a right we had not before."[2]
The meaning of the Extradition Clause was first tested before the Supreme Court in the case of Kentucky v. Dennison (1861). The case involved a man named Willis Lago who was wanted in Kentucky for helping a slave girl escape. He had fled to Ohio, where the governor, William Dennison, Jr., refused to extradite him back to Kentucky. In this case, the court ruled that, while it was the duty of a governor to return a fugitive to the state where the crime was committed, a governor could not be compelled through a writ of mandamus to do so.
Puerto Rico v. Branstad
In 1987, the court reversed its decision under Dennison. The case involved an Iowan, Ronald Calder, who struck a married couple near Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. The husband survived but the wife, who was eight months pregnant, did not. Following the incident, Calder was charged with murder and let out on bail. While on bail, Ronald Calder fled to his home-state of Iowa. In May 1981, the Governor of Puerto Rico submitted a request to the Governor of Iowa for the extradition of Ronald Calder to face the murder charges. The Governor of Iowa refused the request, and the Governor of Puerto Rico filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The Court rejected it, ruling that, under Kentucky v. Dennison, the Governor of Iowa was not obligated to return Calder. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court, overruling its existing precedent, reversed, ruling unanimously that the Federal Courts did indeed have the power to enforce a writ of mandamus and that Kentucky v. Dennison was outdated.
Fugitives for whom extradition had been refused under the former rule are now subject to extradition.[3]
References
- ^ a b Heritage Foundation (Washington, D.C.) (2005). The Heritage Guide to the Constitution. Edwin Meese, III: Regnery Publishing. pp. 273. ISBN 1-59698-001-X.
- ^ Quote taken from book review by Kevin Baker, Jan. 28, 2015 of Gateway to Freedom by Eric Foner"
- ^ See Alabama ex rel. Governor v. Engler, 85 F.3d 1205 (6th Cir. 1996) (ordering the Michigan Governor to hand over an Alabama fugitive).
- v
- t
- e
- History
- Articles of Confederation
- Mount Vernon Conference
- Annapolis Convention
- Philadelphia Convention
- The Federalist Papers
- Anti-Federalist Papers
- Massachusetts Compromise
- Virginia Ratifying Convention
- New York Circular Letter
- Hillsborough Convention
- Fayetteville Convention
- Rhode Island ratification
- Drafting and ratification timeline
- Admission to the Union
- Appointments
- Appropriations
- Assistance of Counsel
- Case or Controversy
- Citizenship
- Commerce
- Compact
- Compulsory Process
- Confrontation
- Congressional enforcement
- Contingent Elections
- Contract
- Copyright and Patent
- Double Jeopardy
- Due Process
- Elections
- Engagements
- Equal Protection
- Establishment
- Exceptions
- Excessive Bail
- Ex Post Facto
- Extradition
- Free Exercise
- Free Speech
- Fugitive Slave
- Full Faith and Credit
- General Welfare
- Guarantee
- House Apportionment
- Impeachment
- Import-Export
- Ineligibility
- Militia
- Natural-born citizen
- Necessary and Proper
- No Religious Test
- Oath or Affirmation
- Original Jurisdiction
- Origination
- Pardon
- Petition
- Postal
- Presentment
- Presidential Electors
- Presidential succession
- Privileges and Immunities
- Privileges or Immunities
- Recess appointment
- Recommendation
- Self-Incrimination
- Speech or Debate
- Speedy Trial
- State of the Union
- Supremacy
- Suspension
- Take Care
- Takings
- Taxing and Spending
- Territorial
- Title of Nobility (Foreign Emoluments)
- Treaty
- Trial by Jury
- Vesting (Legislative / Executive / Judicial)
- Vicinage
- War Powers
- Balance of powers
- Concurrent powers
- Constitutional law
- Criminal procedure
- Criminal sentencing
- Dormant Commerce Clause
- Enumerated powers
- Equal footing
- Executive privilege
- Implied powers
- Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
- Judicial review
- Nondelegation doctrine
- Plenary power
- Preemption
- Reserved powers
- Saxbe fix
- Separation of church and state
- Separation of powers
- Symmetric federalism
- Taxation power
- Unitary executive theory
Convention President | |
---|---|
New Hampshire |
|
Massachusetts | |
Connecticut | |
New York | |
New Jersey |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
Delaware |
|
Maryland | |
Virginia | |
North Carolina | |
South Carolina |
|
Georgia | |
Convention Secretary |
|
and legacy
- National Archives
- Independence Mall
- Constitution Day
- Constitution Gardens
- Constitution Week
- National Constitution Center
- Scene at the Signing of the Constitution (painting)
- A More Perfect Union (film)
- Worldwide influence